Newest version online today for IE 6 and probably 5.5 as well. I tested it with IE 6 on XP Pro SP1. Much better look and feel and more features in the selection process than any previous version. I also wrote a tutorial explaining setup and usage for this version.
http://www.mgrier.com/newspro/
Mike
Import multiple files bookmarklet for NP 3.73+ (IE 6)
Well, so much for my bookmarklet. alt.binaries.nl dropped msg-id's in the output and went to nzb's. That's the problem with relying on someone else's design. But I've thought some more about doing this on my server, but I don't think I'd do it with nzb's.
The thing is, I have a real bugaboo about redundant information being transmitted. It's wasted bandwidth (and for a person running a server, wasted money). Here is an nzb file as produced by a.b.nl:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE nzb PUBLIC "-//newzBin//DTD NZB 1.0//EN" "http://www.newzbin.com/DTD/nzb/nzb-1.0.dtd">
<nzb xmlns="http://www.newzbin.com/DTD/2003/nzb">
<file poster="EagleForce_NL" date="1075473850" subject="Linux_A_Z.part03.rar EagleForce_NL Linux_A_Z (ftd: 145239)[3/9]">
<groups><group>alt.binaries.e-book.technical</group></groups>
<segments>
<segment bytes="614921" number="1">40195f66$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="2">40195f81$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="3">40195f9d$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="4">40195fb8$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="5">40195fda$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
</segments></file></nzb>
Without counting carriage returns, that's 865 characters. If you take out redundant characters and unnecessary info on the server side, then you can reconstruct the same exact file on the client side. As an example, the relevant data in the above nzb follows:
EagleForce_NL
1075473850
Linux_A_Z.part03.rar EagleForce_NL Linux_A_Z (ftd: 145239)[3/9]
alt.binaries.e-book.technical
614921
40195f
$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl
66
81
9d
b8
da
The total characters needed to reconstruct the file is just 177, a savings of 79.5%. As you can see, much of the redundant info is in the message id's themselves. All a program has to do on the server side is compare each character position in all the msg-id's in a part to determine which segments of them are redundant and which are not. Then you split at those points, output the first redundant part, then the last (I would only do 2; that's the norm for msg-id's [prefix and suffix], and doing otherwise would increase the complexity of the format), then the non-redundant parts. The number of non-redundant parts equals the number of segments. This is an extreme example, where only two characters are different in each message-id.
I wouldn't have to reconstruct an nzb file; I could just have a bookmarklet output in the way the current ones I wrote do, since they import fine into Newspro (let it export nzb's).
The thing is, I have a real bugaboo about redundant information being transmitted. It's wasted bandwidth (and for a person running a server, wasted money). Here is an nzb file as produced by a.b.nl:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE nzb PUBLIC "-//newzBin//DTD NZB 1.0//EN" "http://www.newzbin.com/DTD/nzb/nzb-1.0.dtd">
<nzb xmlns="http://www.newzbin.com/DTD/2003/nzb">
<file poster="EagleForce_NL" date="1075473850" subject="Linux_A_Z.part03.rar EagleForce_NL Linux_A_Z (ftd: 145239)[3/9]">
<groups><group>alt.binaries.e-book.technical</group></groups>
<segments>
<segment bytes="614921" number="1">40195f66$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="2">40195f81$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="3">40195f9d$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="4">40195fb8$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
<segment bytes="614921" number="5">40195fda$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl</segment>
</segments></file></nzb>
Without counting carriage returns, that's 865 characters. If you take out redundant characters and unnecessary info on the server side, then you can reconstruct the same exact file on the client side. As an example, the relevant data in the above nzb follows:
EagleForce_NL
1075473850
Linux_A_Z.part03.rar EagleForce_NL Linux_A_Z (ftd: 145239)[3/9]
alt.binaries.e-book.technical
614921
40195f
$0$143$e4fe514c@dreader13.news.xs4all.nl
66
81
9d
b8
da
The total characters needed to reconstruct the file is just 177, a savings of 79.5%. As you can see, much of the redundant info is in the message id's themselves. All a program has to do on the server side is compare each character position in all the msg-id's in a part to determine which segments of them are redundant and which are not. Then you split at those points, output the first redundant part, then the last (I would only do 2; that's the norm for msg-id's [prefix and suffix], and doing otherwise would increase the complexity of the format), then the non-redundant parts. The number of non-redundant parts equals the number of segments. This is an extreme example, where only two characters are different in each message-id.
I wouldn't have to reconstruct an nzb file; I could just have a bookmarklet output in the way the current ones I wrote do, since they import fine into Newspro (let it export nzb's).
@Slotboxed,
Fist off: Thanks for this wonderful program, this will save me and many others LOADS of time !
One Question though, I was just now trying your program for the first time, and I seem stuck at the "Processing" screen, it has been running now for some 5 minutes on a selection of some 60 files, I then retried with just 2-3 files to check if it is just a matter of patience....but the same here, it seems stuck at the "processing" screen
Any idea what might be going wrong?
Fist off: Thanks for this wonderful program, this will save me and many others LOADS of time !
One Question though, I was just now trying your program for the first time, and I seem stuck at the "Processing" screen, it has been running now for some 5 minutes on a selection of some 60 files, I then retried with just 2-3 files to check if it is just a matter of patience....but the same here, it seems stuck at the "processing" screen
Any idea what might be going wrong?
@Slotboxed,
Fist off: Thanks for this wonderful program, this will save me and many others LOADS of time !
One Question though, I was just now trying your program for the first time, and I seem stuck at the "Processing" screen, it has been running now for some 5 minutes on a selection of some 60 files, I then retried with just 2-3 files to check if it is just a matter of patience....but the same here, it seems stuck at the "processing" screen
Any idea what might be going wrong?
Fist off: Thanks for this wonderful program, this will save me and many others LOADS of time !
One Question though, I was just now trying your program for the first time, and I seem stuck at the "Processing" screen, it has been running now for some 5 minutes on a selection of some 60 files, I then retried with just 2-3 files to check if it is just a matter of patience....but the same here, it seems stuck at the "processing" screen
Any idea what might be going wrong?
no, it shouldn't take that long. it does about 3 or 4 a sec for me on cable. Are you seeing any activity on the status bar?
And you're using the latest version? I made some changes even after I posted this morning.
Are you getting any script errors? I could see about putting some debug code in. Most likely it's stuck on the first file.
And you're using the latest version? I made some changes even after I posted this morning.
Are you getting any script errors? I could see about putting some debug code in. Most likely it's stuck on the first file.
@Slotboxed,
Problem resolved, it is my popup and ad-filter that is causing the problem, I've uninstalled it (as just disabling did NOT work) and now it works like a charm.
Since I am now WITHOUT a popup blocker, I'd be interested to hear wich one you are using, as that one is probably supported
Again, many thanks !
Problem resolved, it is my popup and ad-filter that is causing the problem, I've uninstalled it (as just disabling did NOT work) and now it works like a charm.
Since I am now WITHOUT a popup blocker, I'd be interested to hear wich one you are using, as that one is probably supported
Again, many thanks !
Well, I wasn't using any at the moment, though I used to use AdMuncher when I was running Win98. Haven't got around to installing it on XP yet. Anyway, I went to http://www.popup-killer-review.com/inte ... p-stop.htm to see what was listed. I tried the free PopupManager and it's fine.
Funny thing is, I'm not doing any window.open calls at all, just dynamically rewriting the same page. What is the name of your (former) popup killer? I remember AdMuncher messing with some programming tool I used.
Funny thing is, I'm not doing any window.open calls at all, just dynamically rewriting the same page. What is the name of your (former) popup killer? I remember AdMuncher messing with some programming tool I used.
I also just tried your bookmarklet, and it's amazing. Thanks for this great tool!
Is something like this also possible for Opera (my default browser)? Had to switch to Firebird to use it (I avoid IE wherever I can), which is of course no problem - but if it worked with Opera that would be even better!
Is something like this also possible for Opera (my default browser)? Had to switch to Firebird to use it (I avoid IE wherever I can), which is of course no problem - but if it worked with Opera that would be even better!
The problem with their nzb support is it's 1 nzb per part, not like newzbin where all parts to a file posting are gathered in in one nzb.
Ex. newzbin
1 nzb for a 100-part file
each part containing, let's say, 10 segments
total of 1000 msg-id's in 1 nzb
Ex. a.b.nl
1 nzb for each part of 100-part file
100 nzb's each contain 10 msg-id's
total of 1000 msg-id's in 100 nzb's
So I urge you to reconsider the dropping of clipboard support for now, anyway. On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to format my output as nzb for saving into a file, which could then be imported into Newspro.
Anyway, I'm also looking into doing my own indexing, at least as an exercise for me. I would do most of it at home to keep my costs down, and only upload my compressed data to the server to be indexed by the database. It's kinda silly, because I use Newzbin Premium myself. But, as I said, it's an exercise.
Mike
p.s. about Opera... I downloaded the latest version this afternoon and tried both bookmarklets on it, but neither worked. It truncated the Mozilla by about 5000 characters, so there's no way I could get it to work unless maybe I could split it up into 2 bookmarklets and/or reduce its feature set. The most logical and intuitive way to split it up would be to present the sort/selection page with the first bookmarklet, then process and output the results with the other. I've done this sort of thing before - one in particular I did, before I found out JS files could be used on IE, had 4 small bookmarklets that you ran in sequence to complete the task.
The IE one just sat there like a dead stump. I looked in Opera's JS Console, but no errors showed up, so I don't know how I'd debug it. Both IE and Mozilla have JS debuggers, so that makes them easier to debug. Bookmarklets are harder to debug than normal JS anyway, because the source code is not on an actual web page, and if you have a syntax error, especially in the one-liners, it can be hard to figure out where it is, because what the debugger says is not necessarily the cause.
Myself, I prefer MozillaFirebird because you start with a lean and mean browser, but you are able to augment its feature set the way you want with extensions.
Ex. newzbin
1 nzb for a 100-part file
each part containing, let's say, 10 segments
total of 1000 msg-id's in 1 nzb
Ex. a.b.nl
1 nzb for each part of 100-part file
100 nzb's each contain 10 msg-id's
total of 1000 msg-id's in 100 nzb's
So I urge you to reconsider the dropping of clipboard support for now, anyway. On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to format my output as nzb for saving into a file, which could then be imported into Newspro.
Anyway, I'm also looking into doing my own indexing, at least as an exercise for me. I would do most of it at home to keep my costs down, and only upload my compressed data to the server to be indexed by the database. It's kinda silly, because I use Newzbin Premium myself. But, as I said, it's an exercise.
Mike
p.s. about Opera... I downloaded the latest version this afternoon and tried both bookmarklets on it, but neither worked. It truncated the Mozilla by about 5000 characters, so there's no way I could get it to work unless maybe I could split it up into 2 bookmarklets and/or reduce its feature set. The most logical and intuitive way to split it up would be to present the sort/selection page with the first bookmarklet, then process and output the results with the other. I've done this sort of thing before - one in particular I did, before I found out JS files could be used on IE, had 4 small bookmarklets that you ran in sequence to complete the task.
The IE one just sat there like a dead stump. I looked in Opera's JS Console, but no errors showed up, so I don't know how I'd debug it. Both IE and Mozilla have JS debuggers, so that makes them easier to debug. Bookmarklets are harder to debug than normal JS anyway, because the source code is not on an actual web page, and if you have a syntax error, especially in the one-liners, it can be hard to figure out where it is, because what the debugger says is not necessarily the cause.
Myself, I prefer MozillaFirebird because you start with a lean and mean browser, but you are able to augment its feature set the way you want with extensions.