Usenet Explorer

Getting message: "An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (System: 10054)"

I started up UE this morning and was getting the same message.

Now it states:

"Search failed
No connection could be made because the target machine
actively refused it. (System:10061)"

HotLoomis wrote:Getting message: "An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (System: 10054)"

Here I get the same message but the System number = 10065

Dxben

Getting the same here ???????????

And now...

"Search failed
A socket operation was attempted to an unreachable host.
(System:10065)"

Same here! what can I do? Last update is installed....

Same here

Search Failed. A socket operation was attempted to an unreachable host (System:10065)

Not working since 11AM GMT AFAIK.

system disk failure plus corrupted bios settings.

in the meantime i've started backup configuration at about 50 day retention.

the rest is being fixed.

the failed computer is now alive after recovery console chksdk. power supply has been replaced.

the failed system drive also keeps older data for pending search service upgrade (which is coincidentally will take place shortly), so i'll backup the data first and then change configuration to full retention so all will be back to normal.

i've copied older data, removed the paging file from the system drive to avoid using it until it is replaced and restarted the full service.

where was the option inside the menu, where you can change the port for searching? I can't find it now,?

how long is the retention when search function is full working?

retention is shown on the UE webpage, probably it will be increased.

there is no port setting, ue reads search service configuration from the UE webpage instead so i can change it to some backup configuration if e.g. hardware fails so the service can continue although maybe with smaller retention until the problem is fixed.

maybe we need some kind of immediate feedback so i know if something goes wrong right away to fully use the advantage of this scheme, maybe using a web to sms gateway.

but there was a port setting in older times or do I have wrong memories?

yes it was, i changed that around August to provide for higher retention.