Question about grouping of search results

03 Oct 23: One server was relocated, the server currently doesn't have a public IP address since in the meantime it is running on starlink. I wrote some additional tunnel code running separately to handle this. When the server is engaged the connection is 5600+ days uniform (since around 24 July 2008). In the unlikely case I disengaged the server because of some problem the retention is 1200-3800 days depending on newsgroup. If you experience any issue please let me know.

29 Nov 23: Because of encrypted and obfuscated posts flood mass posted by a few nzb indexing websites using usenet servers as private storage for their members to download the posts - the situation with the content is pretty chaotic since their purpose is to post in such a way, so users must use their website exclusively, when the website disappears - the encrypted posts just eat usenet providers' hard disk space uselessly. If you can't find something specific please let me know at alexbirj at gmail dot com what exactly you can't find for me to check how it is possible to retain the posts. Non-obfuscated posts shouldn't be affected at all, let me know if you notice anything missing.

29 Nov 23: The search protocol had to be upgraded to extend 3 byte (16M+) limit on the server side for number of sets per instance, so at least the version 5.8.3 is needed to access it, otherwise should be no any difference.
Post Reply
Ascendro
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Germany

Question about grouping of search results

Post by Ascendro »

Is there any possiblity to group the search results of related headers in a article group for a better overview like in the newsgroup tab?
Here is an example what I'm meaning:
Article group in the newsgroup tab:
Image
Same result in the search tab:
Image
alex
Posts: 4515
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 5:57 pm

Post by alex »

careful with inserting large images since occasionally i'm on a very slow connection :)

it is possible to implement but it is not straightforward, the code behind the views is not the same.

since the code in different views is not uniform we have different options in different views. if the option exists it means it can be duplicated, but it would take time, so there should be some kind of trade off, since it is not the goal to achieve the absolute option symmetry - it would take a lot of time and would slow adding new options significantly, we would have much less by now.

also as to collections it wasn't possible to add them in several places in once since collections affect a lot of code so it was easier to deal with bugs with narrower focus, in fact it took from april to july to do the job properly (even if from the user point of view collections worked from the beginning to maintain the code integrity i have to follow higher reliability standards than just satisfactory reliability for majority of users).

so mostly time limitations so given in search results view one deals with fewer entries than in a newsgroup view it wasn't the matter of urgency, you can guess the other factors in play here, it would give the answer when the feature may be added, it is not simply yes or no.
Ascendro
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Germany

Post by Ascendro »

Sorry about the integrated images in the thread - I've now changed them to thumbnails, although the pictures does only have png-format. :lol:

It was just a feature request and if you have other things to do it's ok. Maybe you can implement this feature at a later date.
Post Reply